eCRF / EDC build
Database build, eCRF design and validation, edit-check programming across four major platforms.
We keep clinical data connected from capture to analysis, giving the study a clearer, more consistent data flow from start to finish.
Database build, eCRF design and validation, edit-check programming across four major platforms.
Configuration, validation, and operational support for patient- and clinician-reported outcomes.
Standardised coding of clinical data using recognised medical dictionaries, including MedDRA and WHO Drug, applied consistently to GCDMP standards with full traceability.
Real-time review of clinical data to identify inconsistencies, resolve issues early and keep datasets accurate, complete and ready for analysis.
CDASH-aligned CRFs and SDTM-ready exports for downstream programming.
Defined lock criteria, dry runs, and final lock with full audit trail and archive.
Integrated risk assessments and review plans help focus attention where it matters most, supporting a compliant, risk-based clinical data management strategy throughout the study.
Central lab, IRT, ePRO/eCOA, and CTMS integrations validated end-to-end.
21 CFR Part 11, GCP E6(R2/R3), and audit-trail documentation kept inspection-ready throughout the study.
Structured review of audit trail data to identify unusual activity, data changes and potential quality issues, supporting inspection readiness and confidence in data integrity.
From the first CRF through to database lock, our data managers keep study data accurate, reduce ambiguity and prevent avoidable rework, making the study easier to manage as it progresses.
Every analysis, CSR, and submission stands on the data management work beneath it.
Experienced data managers across Medidata Rave, Veeva Vault, Viedoc, and Clincase.
800+ studies; sponsor inspections closed with no critical or major findings.
A 24/7 multilingual site helpdesk keeps data flowing across every timezone.
We build, deploy and operate studies on Medidata Rave, Veeva Vault, Viedoc and Clincase, with a named senior lead on every platform and a build library that shortens set-up without loosening validation.
CRFs and eCRFs are mapped to CDASH from the first draft, so the data arrive in a shape downstream programming can use rather than one that has to be retrofitted later.
Subject-matter experts in data management and biostatistics oversee outsourced work on the sponsor’s behalf, to ICH-GCP E6(R2/R3) expectations, with the evidence logged as the study runs rather than assembled before an inspection.
Where a programme spans several studies or systems, we build the clinical data warehouse beneath it — SDTM-shaped storage, validated loads from every source, and dashboards the wider team can act on.
We implement studies on the four EDC platforms our sponsors run, with a named senior lead and a delivery bench on each.
EDC is the operational backbone of the trial — where sites enter the data, monitors query it, programmers extract it and inspectors eventually read it. We bring senior data managers to each platform rather than a generalist bench, and a reusable build library that shortens set-up without loosening the validation around it.
From eCRF specification through to a configured, integrated database ready for site go-live.
The build is where most downstream problems are either created or prevented. We specify against CDASH from the first draft, programme edit checks that catch real issues without burying sites in queries, and validate every integration end to end before the first patient is entered.
Every release is qualified before it reaches a site, and the evidence is kept as part of the study record.
Validation is not a phase we pass through — it is documentation we maintain for the life of the study. Test scripts, UAT records, computerised-system validation reports, e-signature configuration and audit-trail settings are held together so an inspector can follow the system from specification to production without a reconstruction exercise.
Protocols change and sites need answers. Both are handled without interrupting data flow.
Once a study is live, the work shifts to keeping it clean and keeping sites moving. Amendments run through change control with re-validation and controlled re-deployment, while a 24/7 multilingual helpdesk keeps sites supported across every timezone the study runs in.
A lock that holds, with the export and archive that follow it prepared in advance.
Lock criteria are agreed early and tested through dry runs, so the final lock confirms a state the team has already reached rather than triggering a scramble. The SDTM-ready export and the study archive are prepared as part of close-out, with the audit trail preserved intact.
We manage each stage as part of one continuous process, with ongoing oversight and risk-based review built in throughout.
CRF/eCRF specification, EDC build, validation plan, integration mapping.
Site go-live, monitored data capture, real-time query management.
Continuous data review, risk-based monitoring, central oversight.
Database lock, SDTM export, archive — audit-trail intact.
Behind every clean database lock is a CDM operation running quietly across timezones — a 24/7 site helpdesk, real-time query workflows, edit-check programming, and a validation evidence trail that auditors can walk through. We treat the EDC build as the operational backbone of the trial, not a back-office function.
Talk to an expertWe work across the major EDC platforms, with risk-based monitoring, medical data review and CDISC validation built into the process. This helps teams catch issues earlier, reduce downstream rework and keep data dependable across every handover.

Senior Rave architects, edit-check programmers, and standards leads. Sponsor-side governance on multi-protocol Rave libraries.

Vault CDB and EDC builds, study libraries, integrations with Veeva CTMS and eTMF.

Viedoc Designer-led builds with custom-coded edit checks. Senior expertise on EU and Nordic deployments.
Long-tenure Clincase team — 20+ years of legacy and current study delivery on the platform.
Medical data review and visualisation — embedded into the data pipeline for cross-study safety review.
KQI/KRI dashboards and statistical monitoring driving central oversight decisions.
CDISC validation built into every SDTM and ADaM release.
Learning management for ongoing GCP and platform-specific certifications — kept current across the team.